Full-Funnel Performance Marketing
All channels under one analytics and one KPI. The budget flows to where the lead is cheaper. We manage blended ROAS, not campaigns in isolation.

Goals we set for the website
- 1
- report instead of three conflicting ones
- ROAS
- the single KPI for all channels
- weekly
- budget reallocation on data
Sound familiar?
Three vendors for three channels — and three reports that never reconcile
Each channel is "efficient" by its own report, yet blended ROAS keeps worsening
Budget is split "historically": why search gets 60% and social 20%, nobody remembers
Channels fight over one conversion: retargeting claims what search delivered
Full-Funnel Performance Marketing
What's included
Channel roles
Search and classifieds harvest hot demand, social sows, Telegram warms — each with its own success metric
End-to-end analytics
Call tracking, the CRM, unified attribution — no conversion counted twice
ROAS management
A weekly budget flow by lead and deal cost — not by "historical shares"
One team
All channels in one set of hands: no vendor wars over attribution and budget
CRO circuit
Landing pages, quizzes and offers tested alongside traffic — conversion multiplies every channel
Unified reporting
One weekly report: leads, deals, ROAS, LTV — decisions on the whole picture
How the project runs
How the project runs
- 3-5 days
Audit & media plan
Niche, competitors, unit economics — a cost-per-lead forecast before launch
- 2-4 days
Analytics first
Goals, call tracking, a CRM link — we count before we spend
- 3-7 days
Campaign launch
Structure, ads, landing pages — first leads within the first week
- weekly
Optimization & growth
Query and placement cleanup, bid tests — cost per lead falls systematically
Channels are “efficient” in isolation — while blended ROAS worsens
The classic picture of multichannel marketing. Every vendor has a pretty report. The summed conversions exceed the real sales. And the ad spend share creeps up. The cause is fragmentation. Channels fight over attribution of the same deals. Budgets are distributed historically. Nobody sees the whole picture. The performance approach gathers everything under one KPI. Not a channel’s CTR but the business’s blended ROAS — and every decision obeys it.
Channel roles: who reaps, who sows, who warms
A stack works when each channel has its role and its metric. Search and classifieds reap hot demand, their KPI is strict: the lead cost. Social sows across cold audiences, measured by qualified lead cost and the contribution to assisted conversions. Telegram warms the long decisions: the subscriber and their path to a request. Demanding a reaper’s lead price from a sower is separate management’s typical mistake. It closes support channels as inefficient, and the funnel starves from the top.
Unified attribution: the end of double counting
When retargeting, search and social report separately, one deal gets counted three times. The summed efficiency exceeds the revenue. End-to-end analytics with unified attribution — call tracking, the CRM, deals — closes the trick. Each channel gets its honest contribution. In the factory owner’s review, exactly that step exposed retargeting claiming search’s conversions for years. The budget got distributed by the truth for the first time.
Budget reallocation: Tuesday routine instead of a quarter of approvals
Performance management’s core is the weekly reallocation. Channels get compared by lead and deal cost. The cheap ones receive budget, the overheated get cut. A separate vendor will never offer that: cutting their own channel is against their interests. Inside one team it’s simply a protocol. Tuesday’s data moves Wednesday’s budgets. And the CRO circuit multiplies the effect. Landing, quiz and offer tests run in tandem with the traffic, and conversion growth cheapens the lead in every channel at once.
The report, the boundaries and where it starts
There’s one weekly report. Leads, deals, blended ROAS and LTV by channel — one truth instead of three diverging presentations. Honest frames: the comprehensive format pays off from roughly $4,000-5,000 of total budget, below that we run channels separately and say so straight. The accounts and assets are yours. Guaranteed-100-leads doesn’t exist in auctions. It all starts with the audit. Current channels, analytics, unit economics — and a stack strategy with a forecast we back with process and reputation.
Related case study
Client reviews
Client reviews
I kept three vendors, and each showed success while blended ad spend share grew. Consolidation exposed the trick: retargeting claimed search's conversions. Unified attribution put everything in place. For the first time the budget got distributed by the truth, not by the reports.
The main value is the weekly reallocation. Social delivered cheap leads this month — it got budget. Search overheated — it got cut. Such decisions used to take a quarter of approvals, now it's Tuesday routine.
The CRO circuit doubled the effect without a budget increase. A quiz on the landing page raised ad conversion one and a half times, and that worked on all channels at once. Separate traffic vendors never even offered it: not-their-zone.
Related solutions
Related solutions
Google Ads Setup and Management
A demand-driven structure, analytics before launch and weekly cleanup. Search ads counted in leads and money, not clicks.
International PPC Management
Search, PMax and YouTube for your geos. Campaigns in the audience's language, honest conversions and per-market lead reports.
Meta Ads Management: Instagram & Facebook
Lookalike and engagement segments, two-tap lead forms and a creative pipeline. Meta ads counted in leads and deals, not reach.
FAQ
FAQ about paid advertising
01How much does comprehensive ad management cost?
From $1,500 a month for a 2-3 channel stack with end-to-end analytics and the CRO circuit. Ad budgets are separate, paid to the platforms directly from your accounts. The stack strategy and the media plan are computed free after the audit.
02From what budget does the comprehensive format make sense?
From roughly $4,000-5,000 a month total across channels. Below that, budget reallocation doesn't produce statistically significant decisions, and it's more honest to run one or two channels separately. At the audit we'll count and say straight whether you've grown into the comprehensive format.
03Why is one team better than three separate vendors?
Three things. Unified attribution: conversions don't get claimed twice, a common trick of separate reports. Budget reallocation between channels: a separate vendor will never offer to cut their own channel. And a shared KPI in blended ROAS instead of everyone's local successes. Plus one point of responsibility instead of three.
04How fast does the stack assemble?
3-4 weeks on the move. Analytics and attribution take the first week. Channel takeover or launch runs in parallel. The first full report with all channels comes by the month's end. Working campaigns don't stop. The careful takeover principles match our PPC management service.
05What's the CRO circuit and why is it in an advertising package?
The landing page's conversion multiplies all traffic's efficiency. Raise it one and a half times, and every channel's lead gets one and a half times cheaper. So landing, quiz and offer tests run in tandem with the traffic. Splitting them between vendors means losing the main lever.
Let’s discuss your project
Free estimate and a proposed solution within one day.


